On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 09:21 +0300, Igal.Liberman wrote:
> From: Igal Liberman <igal.liber...@freescale.com>
> 
> This patch is required for: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459584/

If it's required for that patch, why aren't they part of a patchset
rather than independently posted?  I don't see any mention of a
dependency in that patch, so how would I have known not to apply it?

> Signed-off-by: Igal Liberman <igal.liber...@freescale.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/b4420si-post.dtsi |    3 ++-
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/b4860si-post.dtsi |    3 ++-
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/b4si-post.dtsi    |    3 ++-
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p2041si-post.dtsi |    3 ++-
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p3041si-post.dtsi |    3 ++-
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p4080si-post.dtsi |    3 ++-
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p5020si-post.dtsi |    3 ++-
>  7 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/b4420si-post.dtsi 
> b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/b4420si-post.dtsi
> index 1ea8602..9b14f24 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/b4420si-post.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/b4420si-post.dtsi
> @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@
>       };
>  
>       guts: global-utilities@e0000 {
> -             compatible = "fsl,b4420-device-config", 
> "fsl,qoriq-device-config-2.0";
> +             compatible = "fsl,b4420-device-config", "fsl,b4-device-config",
> +                           "fsl,qoriq-device-config-2.0";

Why?

-Scott


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to