On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:35:31PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:16:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:07:38PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>
>> if (!edev->physfn) {
>> pr_warn("%s: EEH dev %04x:%02x:%02x:%01x not for VF\n",
>> edev->phb->global_number, pdn->busno,
>> PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn));
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>>>+
>>>+ driver = eeh_pcid_get(dev);
>>>+ if (driver) {
>>>+ eeh_pcid_put(dev);
>>>+ if (driver->err_handler)
>>>+ return NULL;
>>>+ }
>>
>>dev and driver are NULL for those VFs that have been unplugged. For those
>>VFs weren't unplugged, driver and err_handler should be valid. The code
>>looks correct. However, for consistence, please use EEH_DEV_DISCONNECTED
>>that has been marked to those EEH devices which were unplugged. Do you
>>think it would be better?
>>
>> if (!(dev->flags & EEH_DEV_DISCONNECTED))
>> return NULL;
>>
>
>
>I think this is a nice idea, while this may not work.
>
>We mark the DISCONNECTED flag when remove a PCI device, while before we do the
>hot plug we will detach it from the tree and remove this flag in
>eeh_pe_detach_dev().
>
>This will leads to the VF not be hot plugged.
>
Ok, the following way, with the original idea improved for a bit, would
work for you:
- Don't clear DISCONNECTED flag in eeh_pe_detach_dev().
- Use the flag for your case.
- Clear DISCONNECTED flag after the hogplug is done, right before
eeh_pe_state_clear(pe, EEH_PE_KEEP) in eeh_reset_device().
Thanks,
Gavin
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
