On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:19:16PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 01:46:20PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>EEH on powerpc platform needs eeh_dev structure to track the PCI device
>>status. Since VFs are created/released dynamically, VF's eeh_dev is also
>>dynamically created/released in system.
>>
>>This patch creates/removes eeh_dev when pci_dn is created/removed for VFs,
>>and marks it with EEH_DEV_VF type.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiy...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>After removing the unnecessary line of code as below.
>
>>---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h |    1 +
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c      |    4 ++++
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c   |   11 +++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
>>index a52db28..1b3614d 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
>>@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ struct eeh_dev {
>>      struct pci_controller *phb;     /* Associated PHB               */
>>      struct pci_dn *pdn;             /* Associated PCI device node   */
>>      struct pci_dev *pdev;           /* Associated PCI device        */
>>+     struct pci_dev *physfn;         /* Associated PF PORT           */
>>      struct pci_bus *bus;            /* PCI bus for partial hotplug  */
>> };
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>index 6c7ce1b..221e280 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>@@ -1135,6 +1135,10 @@ void eeh_add_device_late(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>      }
>>
>>      edev->pdev = dev;
>>+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>+     if (dev->is_virtfn)
>>+             edev->physfn = dev->physfn;
>>+#endif
>>      dev->dev.archdata.edev = edev;
>>
>>      if (eeh_has_flag(EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEV))
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>>index f771130..94806a4 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
>>@@ -180,7 +180,9 @@ static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dn 
>>*parent,
>> struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>+     struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
>>      struct pci_dn *parent, *pdn;
>>+     struct eeh_dev *edev;
>>      int i;
>>
>>      /* Only support IOV for now */
>>@@ -206,6 +208,8 @@ struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>                               __func__, i);
>>                      return NULL;
>>              }
>>+             eeh_dev_init(pdn, hose);
>>+             edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
>
>Nothing is done to edev after getting it. So I think the last line of changes
>here isn't needed. Could you check and remove it if I'm correct?

You are right, removed.

>
>Thanks,
>Gavin
>
>>      }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>
>>@@ -254,10 +258,17 @@ void remove_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>      for (i = 0; i < pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev); i++) {
>>              list_for_each_entry_safe(pdn, tmp,
>>                      &parent->child_list, list) {
>>+                     struct eeh_dev *edev;
>>                      if (pdn->busno != pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, i) ||
>>                          pdn->devfn != pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, i))
>>                              continue;
>>
>>+                     edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
>>+                     if (edev) {
>>+                             pdn->edev = NULL;
>>+                             kfree(edev);
>>+                     }
>>+
>>                      if (!list_empty(&pdn->list))
>>                              list_del(&pdn->list);
>>
>>-- 
>>1.7.9.5
>>

-- 
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to