On 15.07.2015 [16:35:16 -0400], Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 04:02:02PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > we currently emit at boot:
> > 
> > [    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [0] 0 1 2 3 [0] 4 5 6 7 
> > 
> > After this commit, we correctly emit:
> > 
> > [    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [0] 0 1 2 3 [1] 4 5 6 7 
> 
> JFYI, the numbers in the brackets aren't NUMA node numbers but percpu
> allocation group numbers and they're not split according to nodes but
> percpu allocation units.  In both cases, there are two units each
> serving 0-3 and 4-7.  In the above case, because it wasn't being fed
> the correct NUMA information, both got assigned to the same group.  In
> the latter, they got assigned to different ones but even then if the
> group numbers match NUMA node numbers, that's just a coincidence.

Ok, thank you for clarifying! From a correctness perspective, even if
the numbers don't match NUMA nodes, should we expect the grouping to be
split along NUMA topology?

-Nish

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to