On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 08:41 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:24:22PM +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > There is a potential gain to be had with a direct > > jump instead of a breakpoint, but the caveats need to be traded off > > with the complexity it brings in. > > > > For now, mark OPTPROBES na for powerpc. > > If we haven't yet investigated whether this feature is something beneficial > to the powerpc kernel, it should just stay as TODO, not be marked as n/a.
Yep, agreed. As discussed in the other thread we'll leave this as TODO until we know it's either not a win or not worth the complexity. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
