On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 11:59 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > > Wire up the syscall number and regs so the tests work on powerpc. > > This patch begs the question: this passes everything?
Doh, yes that would have been worth mentioning! :) I'll update it before I commit it. Yes everything passes, thanks very much for the tests BTW. And for the record I've tested on: ppc64, ppc64 (compat), ppc64le, ppc, ppc64e and ppc64e (compat). > (I was reminded about syscall_restart while reading the patches. If > everything passes, it looks like powerpc exposes syscall_restart? Seems like > ARM remains the odd-arch-out on this. :P) Yeah I noticed that and though "oh jeez not syscall_restart", but it seems to pass, so I guess we behave in a standard fasion for once. I'll have a closer look just to be sure before I merge. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev