On 08/10/15 23:09, Michael Ellerman wrote: > In general platforms are a more important configuration decision than > cpus, so the platforms should come first. > > My basis for saying that is that our cpu selection options are generally > just about tuning for a cpu, rather than enabling/disabling support for > a cpu. On the other hand disabling a platform means you can't boot on > those machines, and any associated cpu options should vanish. > > With this applied the start of menuconfig looks like: > > [*] 64-bit kernel > Endianness selection (Build little endian kernel) > General setup > [*] Enable loadable module support > -*- Enable the block layer > Platform support > Processor support > Kernel options > Bus options > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > --- > arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > index ea9377259f15..0f8c51279147 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ config CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN > > endchoice > > -source "arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype" > - > config PPC32 > bool > default y if !PPC64 > @@ -339,6 +337,7 @@ source "init/Kconfig" > source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer" > > source "arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig" > +source "arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype" > > menu "Kernel options" >
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
