On 01/11/2016 10:16 AM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zane...@linaro.org> writes: > >> On 08-01-2016 13:36, Peter Bergner wrote: >>> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 11:25 -0200, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: >>>> Peter, this solves the issue you reported previously [1]. >>>> >>>> [1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-12/msg00522.html >>> >>> Agreed, thanks. I'll also add the POWER9 support to the GCC side >>> of the patch now that the glibc code is upstream. >> >> I do not see these bits being added in kernel side yet and GLIBC usual >> only sync these kind of bits *after* they are included in kernel side. >> So I would advise to either get these pieces (kernel support and hwcap >> advertise) in kernel before 2.23 release, otherwise revert the patches. > > Ack. > It has just been sent to the correspondent Linux mailing list: > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2016-January/137763.html
Please revert the changes from glibc until you checkin support to linux kernel mainline. Leaving these bits in increases the risk that someone uses to deploy a glibc that then may have the wrong value. Cheers, Carlos. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
