On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 01:08 -0200, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:weust changes the
way the arch checking is done in function
>
> This patch jeeh_add_device_early(): we use no more eeh_enabled(), but instead
> we check therunning architecture by using the macro machine_is(). If we are
> running on
> pSeries or PowerNV, the EEH mechanism can be enabled; otherwise, we bail out
> the function. This way, we don't enable EEH on Cell and we don't hit the oops
> on DLPAR either.
Can't we just check for eeh_ops being NULL ?
Cheers,
Ben.
> Fixes: 89a51df5ab1d ("powerpc/eeh: Fix crash in eeh_add_device_early() on
> Cell")
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpicc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> index 40e4d4a..81e2d3e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> @@ -1072,7 +1072,13 @@ void eeh_add_device_early(struct pci_dn *pdn)
> struct pci_controller *phb;
> struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
>
> - if (!edev || !eeh_enabled())
> + if (!edev)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Some platforms (like Cell) don't have EEH capabilities, so we
> + * need to abort here. In case of pseries or powernv, we have EEH
> + * so we can continue. */
> + if (!machine_is(pseries) && !machine_is(powernv))
> return;
>
> if (!eeh_has_flag(EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEVTREE))
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
