On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 01/25/2016 04:54 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > xencons_disconnect_backend() is only called from xen_console_remove(), > > and also from xencons_probe()/xencons_resume(). But those two are also under > the > same ifdef.
Good point. Aside from this the patch is good. > > which is conditionally compiled, so we get a harmless warning when > > CONFIG_HVC_XEN_FRONTEND is unset: > > > > hvc/hvc_xen.c:350:12: error: 'xen_console_remove' defined but not used > > [-Werror=unused-function] > > > > This moves the function down into the same #ifdef section to silence > > the warning. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > --- > > drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c > > index fa816b7193b6..11725422dacb 100644 > > --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c > > +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c > > @@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ void xen_console_resume(void) > > } > > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HVC_XEN_FRONTEND > > static void xencons_disconnect_backend(struct xencons_info *info) > > { > > if (info->irq > 0) > > @@ -363,7 +364,6 @@ static int xen_console_remove(struct xencons_info *info) > > return 0; > > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_HVC_XEN_FRONTEND > > static int xencons_remove(struct xenbus_device *dev) > > { > > return xen_console_remove(dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev)); > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev