On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 14:32 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 22:09 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 16:07 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote: > > > > > Add a cputable entry for POWER9. More code is required to actually > > > boot and run on a POWER9 but this gets the base piece in which we > > > can > > > start building on. > > > > > > Copies over from POWER8 except for: > > > - Adds a new CPU_FTR_ARCH_30 bit to start hanging new architecture > > > > ARCH thirty? > > > > Would CPU_FTR_ARCH_3 read better? > > > > Or CPU_FTR_ARCH_3_00 ? > > The actual architecture book used to say 2.07 but now says just 3.0. > Hence why I picked 30 vs 207.
Yeah I get the logic. > That being said, I don't really care what we call it. I like CPU_FTR_ARCH_3. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
