Sharon Feldman wrote:
there is more than one implimentation of the ll_temac as well as m ore than one of the plb_temac. I have a combined 2.6 driver that I am working on. It works (or it did last time I tried it) for the ll_temac without the DMA engine. no interrupts, slow with a fairly high rate of dropped packets. The plb_temac portion is only for Fifo based plb_temacs, and is close but not quite working yet. It supports MII and autonegotiation (the last incarnation of the Xilinx MV driver I save posted did not.) I have used the Xilinx MV 2.6 driver - you can find links to it in the ML archives, seems to work well enough but is one speed - I forget which one. It is fairly simple to change the code to a different speed, but it does not support autonegotiation or MII. There is a monsterous patch to the linux-2.6 git tree at http://web.dlasys.net:8888/clients/pico/pico.patch that is for the Pico E12/E14 boards. Aside from the board support it includes My temac driver, The Xilinx MV edk driver, my Uartlite driver, Peter Korsgaard's Uartlite driver as well as in progress support for assorted other facets of the Pico E12/E14. You should be able to apply it to a 2.6.18 source tree, and have support for some additional Xilinx hardware for your board - BUT, most of the drivers require additional data in you board support code. -- Dave Lynch DLA Systems Software Development: Embedded Linux 717.627.3770 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dlasys.net fax: 1.253.369.9244 Cell: 1.717.587.7774 Over 25 years' experience in platforms, languages, and technologies too numerous to list. "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." Albert Einstein |
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
