On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 14:16 -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: > So, like, the other day Benjamin Herrenschmidt mumbled: > > > > Note that there are still things that we might want to change. For > > example, I think we really should look into adding a macro mecanism > > and/or an include mecanism to dtc so that we can do things like #include > > <ibm440gp.dtc> to get the base processor/SoC definition and then > > "overlay" some properties on top of it (like emac phy mode etc...) > > What do people prefer here? Straight CPP pre-run?
CPP pre-run has issue, notably due to the usage of "#" in property names. > Direct support built into dtc to do file-inclusion, macros? We aren't sure yet, though David might have ideas. > Thoughts, opinions, suggestions, pre-NACKs, Cabernet Franc bribes? I'd take the later :-) Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
