>> Another option is to use 46..49 for UARTs #0..3, >> and 192..195 for UARTs #4..7. >> Or, perhaps better, use 46..49 for #0..3, and >> 192..199 for #0..7, handling the duplication in >> the driver; and deprecate the old range. > > That sounds like more hassle than it's worth. The discontinuous range > may be annoying, but it isn't really a huge amount of code.
Yeah. My suggestion would allow to get rid of that extra code some day, though (but sure, is that worth it?) Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
