On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:29:12PM +0300, Valentine Barshak wrote: > diff -ruN linux.orig/drivers/net/ibm_emac/ibm_emac_core.c > linux/drivers/net/ibm_emac/ibm_emac_core.c > --- linux.orig/drivers/net/ibm_emac/ibm_emac_core.c 2007-03-16 > 18:03:51.000000000 +0300 > +++ linux/drivers/net/ibm_emac/ibm_emac_core.c 2007-03-18 > 18:53:08.000000000 +0300 > @@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ > static u32 busy_phy_map; > > #if defined(CONFIG_IBM_EMAC_PHY_RX_CLK_FIX) && \ > - (defined(CONFIG_405EP) || defined(CONFIG_440EP) || defined(CONFIG_440GR)) > + (defined(CONFIG_405EP) || defined(CONFIG_440EP) || defined(CONFIG_440GR) > || \ > + defined(CONFIG_440EPX) || defined(CONFIG_440GRX))
This is getting out of control. Please add a config option for this, and add "select" statements to the Kconfig file where any of the above CONFIG_4.* are defined. > /* 405EP has "EMAC to PHY Control Register" (CPC0_EPCTL) which can help us > * with PHY RX clock problem. > * 440EP/440GR has more sane SDR0_MFR register implementation than 440GX, > which > diff -ruN linux.orig/drivers/net/ibm_emac/ibm_emac.h > linux/drivers/net/ibm_emac/ibm_emac.h > --- linux.orig/drivers/net/ibm_emac/ibm_emac.h 2007-03-16 > 18:03:51.000000000 +0300 > +++ linux/drivers/net/ibm_emac/ibm_emac.h 2007-03-18 18:53:08.000000000 > +0300 > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ > #if !defined(CONFIG_405GP) && !defined(CONFIG_405GPR) && > !defined(CONFIG_405EP) && \ > !defined(CONFIG_440GP) && !defined(CONFIG_440GX) && > !defined(CONFIG_440SP) && \ > !defined(CONFIG_440EP) && !defined(CONFIG_NP405H) && > !defined(CONFIG_440SPE) && \ > - !defined(CONFIG_440GR) > + !defined(CONFIG_440GR) && !defined(CONFIG_440EPX) && > !defined(CONFIG_440GRX) Same here. I know you only added a couple more, but it's reached critical mass (well, it did a while ago). -Olof _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
