My board is using:
bd->bi_intfreq = 50000000;
bd->bi_busfreq = 50000000;
While RPX-Lite is using
bd->bi_intfreq = 48000000;
bd->bi_busfreq = 48000000;
Is this what makes RPX-Lite work and my (MPC 880) not ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Povolotsky, Alexander
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 1:53 PM
To: 'John W. Linville'
Cc: 'Mark Chambers'; 'linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org'; 'Tom Rini'; 'Steven
Blakeslee'
Subject: RE: Linux 2.6-10.rc3 8xx: debugging (over-writing) content of b
d_in fo structure in the kernel booting code
The "one, I am using" from my previous e-mail relates to 2.6.10-rc3
My processor is MPC880.
-----Original Message-----
From: Povolotsky, Alexander
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 1:19 PM
To: 'John W. Linville'
Cc: 'Mark Chambers'; 'linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org'; 'Tom Rini'; 'Steven
Blakeslee'
Subject: RE: Linux 2.6.10-rc3 8xx: debugging (over-writing) content of b
d_in fo structure in the kernel booting code
>Aren't there still generic problems w/ 8xx and 2.6.x?
Allegedly - yes (with memory initialization) but ...
both Tom Rini and Steve Blakeslee were able to boot their
RPXLite Variant of 8xx on 2.6.10-rc3 (the one I am using)
-----Original Message-----
From: John W. Linville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 1:11 PM
To: Povolotsky, Alexander
Cc: 'Mark Chambers'; 'linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org'
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.10-rc3 8xx: debugging (over-writing) content of b
d_in fo structure in the kernel booting code
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:45:53AM -0500, Povolotsky, Alexander wrote:
> Forgot to mention - this board boots (and works) well with Linux 2.4.26
Aren't there still generic problems w/ 8xx and 2.6.x?
--
John W. Linville
linville at tuxdriver.com
