On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:39:05AM +0100, Steven Scholz wrote: > Tom Rini schrieb: > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:16:25AM +0100, Steven Scholz wrote: > > > >>Dan Malek wrote: > >> > >>>Steven Scholz wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>You, Laurent, told us about a race condition. > >>>>You, Dan, first claimed, it was already fix but mentioned later that > >>>>the patch > >>>>was somehow lost. > >>> > >>> > >>>IIRC, it was the usual problem of having it fixed in only one of the > >>>two 2.4 trees. I ensured both trees were made up to date. > >> > >>There is still no fix in linuxppc_2_4_devel! > > > > > > Um, but there is in linuxppc_2_4 ? > Is that a question or a statement?
A question. > I just hab a look at arch/ppc/8xx_io/fec.c in the recent linuxppc_2_4 and > could find this problem fixed! The MII irq is still requested very early > without waiting for the PHY to discovered! So linuxppc_2_4 has a partial fix then is what you're saying? Around what lines? I'm interested to see why _devel doesn't have this. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
