Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>>Hi Pantelis >>> >>>I don't follow you here. Didn't my patch apply cleanly against >>>linuxppc_2_4_devel? >>>I generated my patch against linuxppc_2_4_devel(I think). >>> >>> Jocke >>> >>Nope. >> >>Fails at hunks #7 and #8. >>Don't worry, it's trivial stuff. >> >>Here is enet.c.rej, if you want to check it. >> > >hmm, something is broken here. I can apply my patch to my local copy of >8xx_io/enet.c, BK version 1.24 just fine. Whats your version of enet.c? > > Jocke > > > > My version is the head of the BK tree, updated today.
Regards Pantelis ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
