At 07:56 AM 2/24/2003, brian.auld at adic.com wrote: >However, I noticed that your 'preempt_enable' at the bottom of the exerp has >been changed from 'preempt_enable' as in the RML patch, to >'preempt_enable_no_reshed'. What's the reason for this inconsistency?
Well, as I said I don't use RML patch. This code is from MVL. Frankly, I don't think that this particular change is very important (maybe it is :). I didn't notice any difference between these two versions. It's "if !defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_440)" which is more important :) Eugene ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
