Hi, Downloaded 2.6.16.26 and booted up and got this :
/ # ifconfig eth0 172.28.8.254 up [ 34.034596] 0:00 not found [ 34.037330] eth0: Could not attach to PHY [ 34.041809] 0:00 not found SIOCSIFFLAGS: No[ 34.044526] eth0: Could not attach to PHY such device SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such device I had enabled all the PHY devices in .config and also tried only with Marvell phy enabled. Kernel boot messages : [ 2.296555] Gianfar MII Bus: probed [ 2.301789] eth0: Gianfar Ethernet Controller Version 1.2, 00:01:af:07:9b:8a [ 2.309039] eth0: Running with NAPI disabled [ 2.313307] eth0: 64/64 RX/TX BD ring size [ 2.318498] eth1: Gianfar Ethernet Controller Version 1.2, 00:00:00:00:72:6f [ 2.325738] eth1: Running with NAPI disabled [ 2.330006] eth1: 64/64 RX/TX BD ring size [ 2.335198] eth2: Gianfar Ethernet Controller Version 1.2, 6f:74:3d:2f:64:65 [ 2.342377] eth2: Running with NAPI disabled [ 2.346662] eth2: 64/64 RX/TX BD ring size [ 2.351586] Marvell 88E1101: Registered new driver [ 2.357010] Davicom DM9161E: Registered new driver [ 2.362443] Davicom DM9131: Registered new driver [ 2.367775] Cicada Cis8204: Registered new driver [ 2.373136] LXT970: Registered new driver [ 2.377794] LXT971: Registered new driver [ 2.382461] QS6612: Registered new driver Regards, Prashant Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> 08/11/2006 09:40 AM To Prashant Yendigeri <Prashant.Yendigeri at lntinfotech.com> cc linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org Subject Re: Gianfar eth driver on 8540 ppc - for 2.4 and 2.6 : different outputs On Aug 10, 2006, at 6:18 AM, Prashant Yendigeri wrote: > > Hi, > > The gianfar driver of 2.6.12 and 2.4.20 give different outputs on > the same PPC 8540 board. > > What could be the reason ? > > Output on 2.4.20 : > /root # ifconfig eth0 172.28.8.254 up > eth0: PHY is Marvell 88E1011S (1410c62) > eth0: Auto-negotiation done > eth0: Half Duplex > eth0: Speed 10BT > eth0: Link is up > > Output on 2.6.12 > / # ifconfig eth0 172.28.8.254 up > eth0: PHY is Generic MII (ffffffff) It looks like your 2.6.12 kernel isn't handling the PHY correctly. I'd recommend upgrading to something newer which has the phylib (can't remember which 2.6 that went into). - kumar ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060811/42a84848/attachment.htm
