On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:36:05PM -0800, Eugene Surovegin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 02:54:14PM -0800, Eugene Surovegin wrote: > > Probably it's a race which cannot be avoided anyway because external > > IRQs are completely async, and your version of ppc4xx_pic.c just has a > > bug. I'll think about it a little more. > > Uhh, yes, I think it's a bug in 4xx version of disable_irq. > > We have to ACK parent UIC after disabling IRQ to prevent false > triggering in case this IRQ was already pending during disable_irq > call. > > Here is a patch against current 2.6, so you can get an idea what I'm > talking about :):
Gah, yes. Please add the sign off line and it can go in the mainline. -Matt
