On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 09:05 -0700, Wade Farnsworth wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 17:58, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > ... so any reason why NAND_ECC_SOFT is used instead of making use of the > > ECC registers that come with the NDFC? > > Mainly because I haven't looked at what it would take to get HW ECC > working yet. I'll look at this when I have time, but until then at > least the NAND flashes are functional.
Ok, I figured that was the case and you're absolutely right. HW ECC could be considered more of a feature, and I'd rather have usable NAND now than have to wait longer ;). > > > > Overall, I think the patch looks good. Care to send it to the MTD > > maintainers so it gets in their CVS tree? > > Will do. Thanks. I gave them a heads up, so they'll be looking for it. josh
