On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:02:13PM -0400, Dan Malek wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2005, at 11:37 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > > >.... is there any value in keeping > >the rsync mirrors of the last state of the linuxppc-* trees available? > > Have you been pulling any updates into these trees?
They are semi current with the linux-2.[46] versions, but probably not 100% up to date. > I would like to keep an archive copy, as there is still code in them > that hasn't migrated into main trees. I guess the longer we wait > the less value that has, but I'd like to not lose it. I don' t have > any problem hosting the archives if people still want to use them > for future reference. For the linuxppc-2.5 tree, I did a dirdiff'ing prior to the BK thing comming up and either submitted things, or gave to Paul / Matt Porter what I found (as it was 4xx things) to deal with. For the linuxppc-2.4 tre, I know there's stuff that never went to Marcelo. I'll go re-activate rsync for the trees and have a comment about them being historical archives. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
