Clement Fabien wrote: > Hi, > > Some results: alignments are now respected but it seems that the method > I took from linux 2.4 is more efficient in terms of memory consumption. > I will provide a complete patch today with the same mechanism for > rh_alloc_fixed. > > Fabien > > >
Please don't bother. The other method messes up the deallocations, you just have to live with the wasted space. With rh_alloc_fixed you're suppossed to know your alignment, the align argument is bogus. Pantelis
