On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:57:44AM +0200, Piotr Perak wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Matt Porter wrote: > > > Since you are failing in ocp_add_one_device() and you have a > > processor which doesn't have a chip definition in 2.6, the > > problem is probably somewhere there. Doublecheck your > > arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/ibm405cr.c (you do have one, right?) > > against a known good one in arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/ibm405gp.c > > Because I use ibm405cr.c which works good with 2.4.23 I think that's not > the problem. Remember the call stack?
Which 2.4 tree? linux-2.4, linuxppc-2.4, and linuxppc_2_4_devel haven't had explicit 405cr support that I've noticed. Since the ocp layer has changed that would leave open the possibility of a problem in translating the support to the new ocp layer. > setup_arch() - arch/ppc/kernel/setup.c > -> ocp_early_init() - arch/ppc/syslib/ocp.c > -> ocp_add_one_device() - arch/ppc/syslib/ocp.c > -> alloc_bootmem MACRO calling __alloc_bootmem_core() - > mm/bootmem.c > > When I comment line calling ocp_early_init() I fail in: > > setup_arch() - arch/ppc/kernel/setup.c > -> paging_init() - arch/ppc/mm/init.c > -> free_area_init() - arch/ppc/mm/page_alloc.c > -> free_area_init_node() - arch/ppc/mm/page_alloc.c > -> alloc_bootmem_node() MACRO calling __alloc_bootmem_node - > mm/bootmem.c > -> __alloc_bootmem_core() - mm/bootmem.c > > As you can see again __alloc_bootmem_core. So maybe there's some > problem with memory? Hrm, I see. Did your firmware change between your working 2.4 kernel and your non-working 2.6 kernel? If you're failing in there that would be my first thought. I suppose that's probably not that case though. > Forgive me if I ask stupid questions, but this the first time I have > something to do with the kernel (not counting compiling for my home PC). Well, the 405cr support issue is really throwing me for a loop here. If you're crashing in _alloc_bootmem_core() and haven't hacked any MM code then you're an interesting spot. Can you trace it down to the exact failure in __alloc_bootmem_core? -Matt