On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 05:48:10PM -0400, Andrew Williams wrote: > > No I have no specific code segment in mind. > (perhaps kernel/time.c?) > > I was actually looking forward to 8260 vs 8270 > which have very similar immaps. Do we want to clutter > the 8260_immap with conditional compiles specific to the > 8280 series (70/75/80), or create a new immap_8270.h.
The problem you're thinking of has been addressed with the 'cpm2' rename, as 8260, 8270, etc, etc (82xx) and 85xx are all quite similar. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
