>It really depends on how many apps you're including. If you only need >one app then copying all of glibc in is a waste. If you've got a bunch >of apps then it's probably better to copy on the shared libs. > >On the other hand, if you can get all your apps to compile against >uClibc (or one of the other small libs replacements) then you'll be much >better off. glibc is huge. > >mh
I only intend to use a very small set of tools to accomplish what I want to. So I figured I didn't need to bother with the shared libraries. And having finally gotten all the stuff I needed statically compiled and working, I'm pretty happy with it. :) _________________________________________________________________ Get dial-up Internet access now with our best offer: 6 months @$9.95/month! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
