On Jul 26, 2005, at 9:35 AM, Dan Malek wrote: > > On Jul 26, 2005, at 9:01 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > >> All the other systems (apus, gemini, rpxcllf) were more effort than I >> was wanting to deal with. >> > > Why? The rpxcllf worked not long ago. What happened to the > courtesy of > the past when such updates were applied to all platforms such they > would at least build? After such changes, if there is still a > problem, > the > person should at least contact the maintainer to get it resolved. I > don't > appreciate being demanded to fix something within a short period of > time that someone else broke or else everything I've done in the past > will be discarded.
Well, I think its reasonable amount of time. We are talking about 4-6 months between now and when a 2.6.15 is likely to get released. I'm not 100% sure who broken rpxcllf, but the issue seems to be with the 8xx_io/fec.c driver so it should be resolved with panto's updated driver. I'm just trying to get us back into a sane state and hopefully we will regress building of all our defconfigs more often to catch things sooner. - kumar
