David Gibson wrote: > > Ah, I think I know why this might be - are you using the 2_4_devel > tree? > > All static executables segfaulted before reaching main until very > recently: the 4xx's MMU makes it possible to actually enforce the > execute permission bit on pages. Since most processors don't allow > this, however, there are heaps of bugs in userland (binutils etc.) > where pages aren't marked executable that need to be. In this case > there was instruction just before the got that wasn't marked > executable. > > For now, at least, I've disabled enforcement of the page execute > permissions, because there's just too much stuff that breaks with it > on.
What's the fix for this? It sounds like I want to un-do that change enforcing page execute permissions -- David, could you give me a spot to look and a suggested patch? anyone? thanks, Mark -- Mark Pilon Minolta-QMS P.O. Box 37 Fallon, MT. 59326-0037 1-406-853-0433 ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
