"epicom" wrote: > I have found several bugs in versions 2.4.0-test*, I don't > know if they > exist > in 2.2.* versions, but it is posible.
The first two (of three) do. The first one: > >> return(((unsigned long)(pte_val(*pte)) & PAGE_MASK) | (address & > ~(PAGE_MASK-1))); is logically wrong but I think it is a harmless bug. > In the wish to have been useful to improve the PPC port of > the linux kernel: > > > Luis Recuerda, Thanks, Luis! -- -=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti at mev.co.uk> )=- -=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587 )=- ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
