> -----Original Message----- > From: Eugene Surovegin [mailto:ebs at ebshome.net] > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 11:41 > Hmm, if I'm correct this clock drift (130ppm) should be > handled easily > by NTPD without stepping clock but with slewing. This is why NTPD > exists in the first place, so I don't see any reason to change > the kernel.
NTPD probably handles this correct, but I would like the time to be correct anyways. In our case we might not always have access to a ntpd server, and our input clock is very accurate to begin with.
