Grant Likely wrote: > Does anyone know the origin of xparameter_ml300.h? The > Xilinx EDK generates an xparameters.h file for each design, but the > structure of the file changes between releases. > > I want to know if xparameters_ml300.h is the exact output produced by > EDK or if stuff was changed before it was submitted to the mainline > tree. (ie. all the stuff under the "linux redefines" comment block)
EDK can also generate the "Linux BSP". In this case EDK uses the scripts from (depending on your setup) /opt/xilinx/edk/7.1/sw/ThirdParty/bsp/linux_v2_00_b/data/ In particular, linux_v2_1_0.tcl adds those "linux redefines" and renames xparameters.h to xparameters_ml300.h. > Also, where can I get the bitstream/systemace file that matches > xparameters_ml300.h? The most reliable way is to generate both (bitstream and xparameters_ml300.h) by yourself. :) But if you are speaking about the xparameters_ml300.h in the community trees (linuxppc-2.4 and the 2.6 one from kernel.org), this file is for the reference design by Xilinx: http://www.xilinx.com/ise/embedded/edk6_2docs/ml300_edk3.zip > I've got a custom ml300 image that I'm regression > testing against, but I'd like to also test against some form of 'stock' > image. :) > > Thanks, > g. Thanks, Andrei
