On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:42:37AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote: > Tom, > > >>I just noticed that I might have used the wrong source tree. > >> > >>So which is the BK tree to use: > >> > >>linuxppc_2_4_devel or linuxppc-2.4 ??? > > > > > >It depends on where what you want to use exists. If something is in > >_devel and not in linuxppc-2.4, patches to move features over one at a > >time would be happily reviewed. > > ??? > So which is the most recent?
Aside from possible changes to match upstream subsystem rewrites (such as IDE) there hasn't been any changes in linuxppc-2.4 specific to 8xx that didn't happen in 2_4_devel. > http://www.penguinppc.org/dev/kernel.shtml calls linuxppc_2_4_devel the > "old PPC development tree" !? That's correct. It's becoming more of a pain to maintain or own set of trees to track 2.4 when Marcelo uses BK as well. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
