On Jun 15, 2005, at 9:33 AM, Jason McMullan wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 09:25 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >> Yes, I removed the fcc_regs_c since its not always true. Please don't >> rename the file to cpm2_. I think I'm going to end up renaming them >> to >> pq2_ since that is the most appropriate name. I'd say we are about >> 80% > > PQ2_? But all these devices are on PQ3 also!
Sure and they are in the mpc85xx_* files. Maybe I'm missing some concern people have here. It dont see what the issue is. This is just like how TSEC/gianfar show up in both mpc85xx_* and mpc83xx_*. These files are intended to represent the devices found on a product family (PQ2, PQ3, PQ2 Pro, etc.). There is going to be overlap. Also, its not 100% true that all of the devices on a PQ2 exist in PQ3. For example (and this isn't a great one) the security block on 8248/8272 is different than the security block on PQ3 devices. - kumar
