Stefan Nickl Stefan.Nickl-at-kontron.com |PPC Linux Embedded| wrote: > I already sent this patch to the list and to "davem" who > commited the faulty version, but nobody seems to care...
Here is the exact same patch, packaged slightly differently and re-sent, just in case it got lost in someone's inbox. It is also possible that davem is thinking in terms of changing the sk_buff definition t match this file. Either way, something must be done. # This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch. # # ChangeSet # 2004/06/11 09:00:55-07:00 steve at wing.XXXXXXXXXX # The sk_rcvbuf member does not exist in struct sk_buff # as declared in linux-2.4 skbuff.h. # # net/ipv4/tcp_input.c # 2004/06/11 09:00:53-07:00 steve at wing.XXXXXXXXXX +2 -2 # The sk_rcvbuf member does not exist in struct sk_buff # as declared in linux-2.4 skbuff.h. # diff -Nru a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c 2004-06-11 09:01:35 -07:00 +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c 2004-06-11 09:01:35 -07:00 @@ -476,8 +476,8 @@ 16 + sizeof(struct sk_buff)); space *= rcvmem; space = min(space, sysctl_tcp_rmem[2]); - if (space > sk->sk_rcvbuf) - sk->sk_rcvbuf = space; + if (space > sk->rcvbuf) + sk->rcvbuf = space; } } -- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. steve at XXXXXXXXXX But I have promises to keep, http://www.XXXXXXXXXX and lines to code before I sleep, http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep." ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/