Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> Adrian,
>
> It would be really helpful if you could take a look at getting the
> driver working on a MPC107 based systems. We have not had time to look
> at that fully. However, are intent has always to get the same driver
> working for MPC10x, 824x, 85xx systems since the block is very similar.
>
> - kumar
>
> On Jun 14, 2004, at 8:24 AM, Adrian Cox wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 14:01, Stefan Nickl wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 13:37, Adrian Cox wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 12:01, Stefan Nickl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FYI: The Motorola folks recently pushed a I2C driver called
>>>>> i2c-mpc.c
>>>>> into the 2.4 tree, it seems to be fully OCP'ed, save it seems the
>>>>> platform hooks are only present for 8540 yet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you know which 2.4 tree? It's not in linuxppc_2_4_devel or in the
>>>> main 2.4 kernel. If their driver works with my OCP patch, it would
>>>> save
>>>> a whole lot of effort.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, I was talking about
>>> bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc-2.4
>>
>>
>> It does similar things to mine, but it can support the controller on 8
>> as well as 32 bit busses. I may try putting it into my 2.6 tree and
>> using it on the MPC107.
>>
>> - Adrian Cox
>> Humboldt Solutions Ltd.
>
>
>
>
>
>
I'm thinking about taking the plunge and OCPfying 8xx so perhaps we
can get this thing organized.
I'd like to have a hierarhy of the peripherals like so:
______- CPM -______ ___________ ___
/ / \ \ \
/ / \ \ \
Timers SCC1..n _ SMC__ IDMA DSP-f etc.
/ | \ \ | \
/ | \ \ \ \
UART HDLC Enet QMC UART Transp.
/ \
HDLC0..63 Transp0..63
Of course with only one protocol active per SCC/SMC.
Is something like this supported with the OCP code, and if not
how could I get around in making it work?
IMO, we could share alot of the stuff between the CPM1/CPM2/CPM3...
Regards
Pantelis
P.S. I suck at ASCII art
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
