Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 11:20:30AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >>On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 12:06 +0200, Bertrand Baudet wrote:
>>>There are probably other drivers that have the wrong assumption that IRQ 0 >>>is an unassigned IRQ. Is there a designated "no IRQ assigned" code? There should be one ... that's why such code gets cut/pasted. Unless pci_enable_device() is (now) guaranteed to fail if the device has no IRQ assignment? Possibly that test should vanish, it was evidently a problem for a while but I've not heard reports of such problems lately. It's in 2.6 because of cut/paste from 2.4 code. Feel free to post a patch. - Dave ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
