On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:23:27AM +1200, Robin Gilks wrote: > Tom Rini wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:17:10AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > >>>>>It's in the linuxppc-2.4 tree. I'll try and get it to Marcelo in time > >>>>>for 2.4.21-pre7. > >>>> > >>>>Ahh, found it in http://ppc.bkbits.net:8080/linuxppc-2.4. I did look in > >>>>http://ppc.bitkeeper.com:8080/linuxppc_2_4 but it is not there. Is this > >>>>tree obsolete? > >>> > >>>It's not preferred, certainly. > >> > >>What about linuxppc_2_4_devel? Is that also "non preferred"? > > > > > >Yes. > > Rather than lots of URLs that are NOT recommended, is there one that is?
For the moment it's "whatever you have now is probably fine". For 2.4.23 I would like to get most of _devel cleaned out, wrt 8xx. This will probably leave out some 'new' boards that Wolfgang sent out a long time ago (FWIW, once I get everything else out I do plan to ask Wolfgang if he wants to re-submit those boards or verify there's nothing new needed to what's in _devel or something). If you have a new board, or a bug fix, current kernel.org (BK, snapshots of BK, just official releases) is best. > Also, you refer to 2.4.21-pre but I thought we had moved onto 2.4.23-pre > now. Is the ppc tree really that much out-of-date? Whoops, yes, 2.4.23-pre. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
