On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 12:34:37AM +0800, Jacky Lam wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 05:40:46PM +0800, Jacky Lam wrote: > > > > > > > the kernel you use - vanilla+ppc-patch - is based on linuxppc-2.4, > which > > > > is not appropriate for your system. [At least it was like that some > time > > > > ago. Tom, could you please comment.] Try using the linuxppc_2_4_devel > > > > tree from Bitkeeper or from our FTP server (see http://www.denx.de). > > > > > > I just tried. The result is the same. Using the original > walnut_config, > > > it hangs in mapin_ram(). > > > If I use minimal config, it hangs in __sti(). > > > > > > Does anyone still working on Walnut platform and successfully boot > up > > > 2.4 kernel on that? If no, could someone remember what is the last known > > > working toolchain and kernel on Walnut? > > > > I noticed this about a week ago. It is some kind of merge problem > > between linux-2.4 and linuxppc-2.4. linux-2.4 boot fine on walnut > > for me. I didn't have time to investigate but might take a look at > > it again soon. > > Really? That's so great! Do you have any idea about this? Maybe I can > try to investigate as well. Also, do you remember what is the version just > before this merge problem occurs? Thanks.
Well, maybe I should have cleaned my tree from a 440 build, I had an old CONFIG_440 hanging around causing the kernel to not be happy. At any rate, I verified that current linuxppc-2.4 boots on walnut from stock openbios. -Matt ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
