Tom Rini writes: > My only concern is that is it a good idea to make a 'consistent_alloc' > and 'consistent_free' functions for cache-cohernet processors, which > aren't doing what the name implies? The only possible caller of these > are pci_alloc_consistent and pci_free_consistent, in a cache-cohernet > processor.
"Consistent" means "the cpu and the device see the same stuff in memory". On a cache-coherent system that is true of all normal memory. Surely that is obvious? Paul. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
