On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 05:37:55PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote: > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 11:20:02AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote: > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > I think we should move the board specific defines such as > > > > > > /*** RPXCLASSIC *****************************************************/ > > [snip] > > > etc. out of ./include/asm-ppc/commproc.h into the board specific header > > > files like ./arch/ppc/platforms/xxx.h > > > > Yes, we should. Patches vs linuxppc-2.5 (note, you won't be able to > > boot 8xx unless you perform some other updates) happily accepted. > > Ehm... Does that mean you won't accept patches vs linuxppc-2.4 though > !?!?
That means I want this to be done in 2.5 first. Where development is supposed to happen. I have this feeling that fixing commproc.h will be more than 1 simple patch and we should do it in the development tree first. Then, once that's all done and people are happy with it, we can move it to linuxppc_2_4. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
