On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:19:53AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > On Tue, 25 May 2004, Matt Porter wrote: > > > On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 09:12:10AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > i thought it had been well-established by now that this had to go. > > > what's the protocol for someone putting these changes into the tree? > > > just curious. > > > > Post a patch. If it's something that is incorrect in linux-2.5 > > as well, then the patch is expected to be against linux-2.5. > > post to this list? sure, if that's the right place. the only reason i'm > obsessed about that little fix as opposed to all the others that are going
Yes, post to this list for embedded-specific patches (8xx). If it's a clear fix, somebody will put it into linux-2.5 and it will be pulled into linuxppc-2.5 on the next merge. Put [PATCH] in the subject and mention what BK tree it's made against. Let me say this again, but a bit clearer so that _everybody_ understands. A patch is the standard unit of communication here. If you don't post a patch that represents your ideas or proposed fixes, your thoughts are likely to get lost in all the noise on these lists. -Matt ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
