On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 09:12 +0800, Michael Hao wrote: > jffs2_scan_empty(): Empty block at 0x0064ffec ends at 0x00650000 (with > 0x1985e002)! Marking dirty
Harmless message complaining that you didn't give a correct '-e' (erasesize) option to mkfs.jffs2 when the image was created. It's OK to build an image with an erasesize smaller than the actual hardware as long as you don't include cleanmarkers though. > I have asked this is why, I change a filesystem and make jffs2,it also > likes this? Do you include /dev in your file system or was it designed with devfs in mind? -- dwmw2 ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
