Robert P. J. Day wrote: >On Fri, 28 May 2004 rdiz at alumni.deec.uc.pt wrote: > > >>Did you actually manage to compile standard (no tweak), 2.6.7-rc1 for 8xx? >>If so, what '8xx Machine Type' did you chose? >> > >and here's another almost assuredly dumb question on my part -- can >someone clarify the different kernel source trees that are under >discussion here? > I could try but I'm not insane yet :). Tom?
> >the one i'm playing with is ppc.bkbits.net:8080/linuxppc-2.5, while the >posting above suggests a recent version straight from the stock kernel.org >repository. > that's the one I working one too. > >what's the protocol for patches and updates? do first attempts at patches >go into the 2.5 tree and, from there, get pushed up to the stock tree? >just curious about the proper way i should be updating my source tree and >testing. > >thanks. > >rday > > > > > Regards Pantelis ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
