Jean-Denis,
Wednesday, April 10, 2002, 1:31:05 PM, you wrote: <snip> JDB> What is even more strange, I can put the 'sync' everywhere in the '__sti' JDB> function, that is before the 'mfmsr', before the 'ori', or before the JDB> 'mtmsr', JDB> and the problem of spurious interrupt simply disappear. Remove it, it JDB> reappears. <snip> JDB> Hard to explain... Even harder to explain is why you're having to put those syncs in __sti, since both my copies of 2.4.16 and 2.4.18-pre9 kernel sources already have them in the code... and with the comment "/* Some chip revs have problems here... */" !!! []'s, Scop mailto:scop at vanet.com.br ------------------------------------------------------------------ "We all lie in the gutter, but some of us look up at the stars." -- Oscar Wilde ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
