Hi Kurt, I have rebuild libc library to run busybox and the result is a libc of 595 k. For a simple aplication like Hello World the result is a libc of 477 k. The libc without optimization it has 1.2 M.
-----Mensaje original----- De: Kurt Wall [SMTP:kurt.wall at timesys.com] Enviado el: jueves, 18 de abril de 2002 20:27 Para: IGOR LURI Asunto: Re: Minilibc works better than Library Optimizer An unnamed source, IGOR LURI, told us: > > Hi all, > I have waste a lot of time with Library Optimizer and I dont have succes > with it. The glibc optimized with this tool doesn't work to me. However, I > have found another tool named MINILIBC that works fine. This tool can be > downloaded from > > http://oss.software.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/projects/minilibc/rel > eases/ > > I have proobed with glibc-2.2.3 and works fine, I recomend to use this tool > instead of library optimizer. What were the results? What were the savings? Kurt -- Future looks spotty. You will spill soup in late evening. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/