Hi Kurt,

I have rebuild libc library to run busybox  and the result is a libc of  595
k. For a simple aplication like  Hello World the result is a libc of 477 k.
The libc without optimization it has 1.2 M.

        -----Mensaje original-----
        De:     Kurt Wall [SMTP:kurt.wall at timesys.com]
        Enviado el:     jueves, 18 de abril de 2002 20:27
        Para:   IGOR LURI
        Asunto: Re: Minilibc works better than Library Optimizer

        An unnamed source, IGOR LURI, told us:
        >
        > Hi all,
        > I have waste a lot of time with Library Optimizer and I dont have
succes
        > with it. The glibc optimized with this tool doesn't work to me.
However, I
        > have found another tool named MINILIBC that works fine. This tool
can be
        > downloaded from
        >
        >
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/projects/minilibc/rel
        > eases/
        >
        >  I have proobed with glibc-2.2.3 and works fine, I recomend to use
this tool
        > instead of library optimizer.

        What were the results? What were the savings?

        Kurt
        --
        Future looks spotty.  You will spill soup in late evening.

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/



Reply via email to