On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:22:26PM +0800, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: > Good point. > There is also IMMR need to be passed from bootloader to kernel. We > can make more use of the u-boot bd_info mechanism. But it binds ppc > linux to u-boot boot loader. I don't know if we should make it a > porting convention.
Well, immr is _already_ part of bd_t passed from U-Boot! I was surprised that none of board ports (some of which are made for U-Boot only) use this. In 8248 based board port I'm working on right now, I already defined CPM_MAP_ADDR as follows: #define CPM_MAP_ADDR (((bd_t*)__res)->bi_immr_base) -- Eugene
