The MPC8260 and 824x I2C are definitely different. Also, I doubt that the DINK32 implementation is suitable for anything other than an example of how to use the I2C interface. The PPCBoot implementation is a hacked together glue piece that makes the DINK32 pieces sort of work. Ugly, ugly, ugly.
gvb At 02:04 PM 8/7/2002 -0400, Mark A. Greer wrote: >acurtis at directvinternet.com wrote: > > > > I noticed that ppcboot has the mpc824x i2c working now. They lifted > > > Motorola's DINK32 driver and hacked it in. > > > > > > Is anyone working to bring mpc824x i2c support to the linux kernel? > >Not at this time that I am aware of. > > > There is mpc8260 support, is that significantly different? > >I believe so. > >Mark > > ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
