akuster writes: > I object seriously. > > Some of what you have might be useful.:) OCP is not just for 4xx. In > fact the name may need to change. I have been working on overhalling > this interface and testing the ideas before having a review of the > changes. I am on the hook to Paul and others to get this out in the > open to discuss and am not ready. So if you could just relax and wait I > would appriciate it. I would rather see the 2.5 kernel boot on a few > 4xx boards
Two points: - Integrating the OCP stuff into the unified device model (driverfs etc.) in 2.5 is essential. - I really want to have some open discussions about ideas, structures etc. for OCP support *before* you have everything fully worked out. :) Regards, Paul. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
