Matt Porter wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:54:20PM +0000, Jon Masters wrote: >> I am trying to find out how we can get the stock >>official kernel distributed by kernel.org to reflect some of the changes >>which have been made. > > Post patches versus the BK linux-2.4 tree here so they can be discussed. > If they are suitable for merging upstream (Paul is happy) then they will > be moved into the for-marcelo-ppc tree. This is a slow process unless > the changes are straightforward bug fixes or cleanups. > > Merging patches into linuxppc-2.4 is much quicker and allows a wider > audience to test significant changes to help determine if they are > suitable to go upstream. Stuff will get merged from linuxppc-2.4 > upstream over time.
Hey, if Jon wants to help merge stuff from linuxppc-2.4 upstream, don't discourage him! :-) But it's true, some of the stuff Jon's interested might still be stuck in linuxppc_2_4_devel, and need merging into linuxppc-2.4 (hope I got those names right), and maybe he should do that first. - Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
